Finebaum Rips “Drunk” CFP Rankings in Fiery Alabama Rant

Paul Finebaum unleashed on the College Football Playoff committee Wednesday morning, calling its initial rankings “discombobulated” and suggesting the members looked “drunk” when they placed Alabama at No. 5 and Tennessee at No. 13.
The ESPN analyst and longtime SEC voice did not hold back during an appearance on Get Up.
“It is about as discombobulated a ranking as I have ever seen,” Finebaum said.
“I would use words like the committee was drunk, but that would be inappropriate for such an august group of people.”
His primary target was Alabama’s ranking.
The Crimson Tide are 6-2 this season.
Tennessee is also 6-2.
Tennessee beat Alabama 26-10 on October 19 at Neyland Stadium.
Despite that head-to-head result, the committee slotted Alabama at No. 5 and Tennessee at No. 13 — a gap of eight spots.
“Alabama has no business being where they are,” Finebaum said.
“That is truly absurd to have Alabama that far ahead of Tennessee, a team that just disemboweled them a couple weeks ago in Neyland Stadium.”
The initial CFP top 12, in order, were: Miami (No. 1), Georgia (No. 2), Utah (No. 3), Indiana (No. 4), Alabama (No. 5), Kentucky (No. 6), Texas (No. 7), UCLA (No. 8), BYU (No. 9), Ole Miss (No. 10), Notre Dame (No. 11) and Ohio State (No. 12).
Ohio State would be the first team out if the field started today.

Tennessee landed at No. 13, just outside the playoff picture.
Finebaum’s frustration centers on a core question: how can the committee justify ranking Alabama eight spots higher than a team that beat them soundly on the field?
The College Football Playoff selection committee uses several criteria to evaluate teams.
Those criteria include strength of schedule, results against quality opponents, conference championships won, and head-to-head competition.
Committee chair Hunter Yurachek has explained that head-to-head results become especially important when teams are grouped closely in the evaluation process.
But in this case, the committee appears to have given more weight to Alabama’s overall résumé than to Tennessee’s direct victory.
Alabama’s schedule does include several strong opponents.
The Tide went on the road earlier this season and beat No. 16 Mississippi State, 56-23.
The following week, they lost to No. 2 Georgia, but that game ended 20-17 and came down to the final minutes.
Alabama also defeated Texas A&M, 31-20, though that win has lost some luster — the Aggies started the season ranked No. 8 but have since fallen to 4-4 and sit near the bottom of the SEC standings.
Finebaum noted that the Mississippi State win may not carry as much weight as it appears to.
Bulldogs star quarterback Kamario Taylor was limited with an injury during that game, a fact Finebaum said the committee should consider.
Tennessee, meanwhile, has its own strong results.

The Volunteers are also 6-2, with their losses coming to quality opponents.
And they have the head-to-head win over Alabama, which Finebaum argued should be the deciding factor.
The debate reflects a larger tension within the CFP selection process.
The committee has long maintained that it evaluates the entire body of work, not just one game.
But critics, including Finebaum, argue that when two teams have identical records and one beat the other, the head-to-head result must carry decisive weight.
“It really doesn’t make any sense,” Finebaum said.
The controversy is unlikely to fade quickly.
Both teams have crucial games this weekend that will provide the committee with fresh evidence.
Alabama travels to face No. 14 LSU on Saturday.
Tennessee meets No. 6 Kentucky.
A strong Alabama win could reinforce its current position.
A Tennessee victory over a top-10 opponent would strengthen the Volunteers’ argument and put more pressure on the committee to close the gap.
The next set of CFP rankings will be released next week.

Until then, Finebaum’s rant will continue to echo across college football circles.
His comments on Get Up were widely shared on social media, drawing reactions from fans, analysts and even some coaches.
The clip posted to X (formerly Twitter) by the Get Up account included Finebaum’s full statement and has already generated thousands of views.
Finebaum has built his career on sharp, unfiltered commentary about SEC football.
He is often called “the voice of the SEC” and has a long history of criticizing the CFP committee when he believes it has mishandled rankings involving southern programs.
This is not the first time Finebaum has taken aim at the committee.
He has previously questioned rankings involving Alabama, Georgia and other SEC teams when he felt the committee undervalued conference strength or head-to-head results.
But Wednesday’s rant was notably more pointed than usual.
The word “drunk” — even delivered with a caveat that it would be “inappropriate” — drew immediate attention.
It signaled that Finebaum believes the committee’s decisions were not just questionable but fundamentally irrational.
“It is about as discombobulated a ranking as I’ve ever seen,” he repeated.
The CFP committee has not issued a formal response to Finebaum’s criticism.
Committee members typically do not engage publicly with media commentary, preferring to let the rankings speak for themselves.
But the controversy highlights a recurring challenge for the selection process.
The committee must balance multiple, sometimes conflicting, criteria.
Head-to-head results are one factor among many.
Strength of schedule, quality of wins, and even the eye test all play a role.
That complexity can produce rankings that appear contradictory to casual fans and even to seasoned analysts.
Finebaum’s argument is straightforward: when two teams have the same record and one beat the other, the winner should be ranked higher.
The committee’s counterargument, implied by the rankings, is that Alabama’s overall body of work — including close losses to elite teams and wins over ranked opponents — justifies a higher placement despite the loss to Tennessee.
That logic has not satisfied Finebaum or many Tennessee supporters.
For Tennessee, the ranking is a bitter pill.
The Volunteers dominated Alabama in a game that was not as close as the final score suggests.
Tennessee led 20-7 at halftime and never trailed.
The 26-10 final margin reflected a game that was controlled from start to finish by Josh Heupel’s team.
To see Alabama ranked eight spots higher in the initial CFP poll felt, to many Tennessee fans, like a dismissal of what happened on the field.

Finebaum gave voice to that frustration.
“A team that just disemboweled them,” he said, choosing a word that left no ambiguity about his view of the game’s reality.
The debate will now play out on the field.
Alabama faces LSU in Baton Rouge, a hostile environment and a ranked opponent.
Tennessee hosts Kentucky, a top-10 team in the initial rankings.
Both games offer the Volunteers and the Crimson Tide a chance to make their cases in a way the committee cannot ignore.
If Alabama wins impressively, the committee may feel validated.
If Tennessee wins and Alabama stumbles, the pressure to adjust the rankings will intensify.
Either way, Finebaum has ensured that the conversation will not die quietly.
His rant has become the defining reaction to the first CFP rankings of the 2026 season.
And with more games to be played and more rankings to come, the story is far from over.
The committee will release its next set of rankings on Tuesday, November 10.
By then, the results from this weekend’s games will be in, and the debate will have fresh data to feed on.
Finebaum, for his part, is unlikely to stay silent.
He has never been shy about revisiting a topic when he believes he was right.
And on Wednesday, he made it clear that he believes the committee got this one badly wrong.
Advertisement





