Greg McElroy Questions CFP Committee Over Tennessee Ranking Eight Spots Behind Alabama

Tennessee beat Alabama 26-10 in Week 7 and shares an identical two-loss record with the Crimson Tide, yet debuted eight spots lower at No. 13 in the initial College Football Playoff rankings.
The reveal of the debut rankings immediately ignited a firestorm across the sport.
Fans in Knoxville and across the country voiced immediate outrage over the gap between the two Southeastern Conference rivals.
Yet the frustration was not confined to passionate supporters posting online.
Prominent national analysts expressed disbelief at the committee's decision.
Among the most compelling voices questioning the board was former Alabama national championship quarterback Greg McElroy.
MCELROY SPEAKS OUT
McElroy appeared on the official selection show on ESPN on Tuesday night.
He then expanded upon his thoughts in greater detail on his show, Always College Football.
Speaking directly to his audience, the former Crimson Tide passer did not mince words.
He admitted the committee's placement of the two teams did not sit well with him at all.
"One of the first real difficult ones for me to kind of stomach," McElroy said about the Tennessee-Alabama rankings.
McElroy pointed out that the tangible on-field result between the programs seemed completely disregarded.
"Because here’s my problem with Tennessee," McElroy explained.
"Like, Tennessee beat Alabama head-to-head."
He emphasized that the game was not an accidental or fluky finish decided by a missed kick.
"Alabama did not look good in that game," McElroy noted.
"Alabama did not move the ball with consistency in that game."
"Tennessee controlled the line of scrimmage in that game."
A DECISIVE HEAD-TO-HEAD MEETING
The details from that Week 7 encounter in Knoxville strongly support McElroy's assessment.
Tennessee dominated Alabama on both sides of the ball to earn the 26-10 victory.
The Volunteers racked up 347 yards of total offense during the contest.
Alabama managed just 201 yards of offense in response.
The Crimson Tide struggled to find any sustained rhythm against the aggressive Tennessee front.
Tennessee dictated the tempo and physicality throughout the four quarters.
Despite that convincing outcome, the selection committee saw a massive chasm separating the two programs.
Alabama landed at No. 5 as the highest-ranked two-loss team in the entire country.
Tennessee found itself pushed down outside the top twelve at No. 13.
THE COMMITTEE'S POD EXPLANATION
The chairman of the selection committee, Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek, offered an explanation that only fueled further debate.
Yurachek revealed that the committee never directly compared Tennessee and Alabama head-to-head.
Under committee protocol, teams are evaluated and grouped into small clusters before being ranked.
"When you’re trying to compare teams head to head, they have to be in the same pod to be compared head to head," Yurachek said.
Because Alabama was placed in an earlier grouping than Tennessee, the Week 7 game was never factored into their relative positions.
Yurachek emphasized Alabama's other marquee achievements across the season.
He highlighted road victories against Kentucky and Mississippi State as critical drivers for the Crimson Tide's climb.
He pointed out that Alabama went on the road and beat Mississippi State when the Bulldogs were undefeated and at full strength.

Mississippi State has since stumbled to a 4-4 record on the season.
Yurachek also pointed to Alabama's home victory over South Carolina.
OFFENSIVE METRICS OVER DEFENSIVE STRENGTH
McElroy identified another systemic issue with how the committee appeared to evaluate Tennessee's profile.
He argued that the selection committee placed disproportionate value on flashy offensive numbers.
"I also look at Tennessee, and it’s almost like the committee is putting more of a premium on offensive efficiency numbers," McElroy said.
"Teams that play great offense have been rewarded in many cases, whereas Tennessee, they sit at 41st in offensive efficiency."
"It’s like, yeah, never mind the 4th-ranked defensive efficiency, can you score?"
"And that hasn’t really been the case for Tennessee."
"It’s not how they’ve tried to win games."
Tennessee has built its campaign around a suffocating defense rather than high-scoring shootouts.
That defensive identity has kept the Volunteers competitive in every matchup this season.
MEASURING THE LOSSES
McElroy also contrasted the quality of defeats suffered by the Volunteers.
Tennessee suffered road heartbreak against South Carolina and dropped a tight home battle against Texas.
Both defeats came by only three points apiece.
"Now, they have a couple losses: at South Carolina, you lost to Texas at home," McElroy noted.
"No shame in that."
"And yet you lose two games by a combined six points, you sit at (No.) 13."

"Eight spots behind a team that you beat head-to-head. That’s a hard one for me to wrap my head around."
McElroy emphasized that Tennessee's entire body of work warranted far more respect from the selection panel.
"Now, I think you can make a very strong argument on behalf of Tennessee to be a Top 10 team, and you can easily make a case they should be ahead of Alabama," McElroy said.
"So I can understand why Tennessee fans are very frustrated right now."
"I would be frustrated if I were them as well."
WIDESPREAD MEDIA SCRUTINY
McElroy was far from the only national media personality stunned by the initial bracket reveal.
Fox Sports commentator Joel Klatt delivered an animated reaction questioning the committee's logic.
On3 analyst Andy Staples was similarly vocal in criticizing the eight-spot disparity between the two SEC rivals.
The committee's treatment of the SEC at large quickly became a central talking point across sports media.
Ten SEC programs secured places in the committee's Top 25 rankings.
Eight of those ten SEC schools were ranked higher by the committee than in the Associated Press poll.
All six two-loss SEC teams landed higher than their positions in both the AP and coaches polls.
National college football writer Chris Hummer of 247Sports posted that a three-loss SEC team making the playoff field is very much in play.
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey spent years lobbying for evaluation metrics that emphasize strength of schedule.
The selection committee's debut board appeared to validate that push across the board.
Alabama at No. 5 and Texas at No. 7 both placed above undefeated 8-0 UCLA, which owns a road win over Oregon.
Texas brought a compelling case with a nonconference win over Ohio State alongside victories over Ole Miss and Tennessee.
Notre Dame took a dramatic fall to No. 11, dropping seven spots below its AP ranking due to a lack of signature wins.

Yet the Alabama placement over Tennessee remained the single most polarizing choice on the board.
ALABAMA'S ON-FIELD QUESTIONS
While the committee celebrated Alabama's résumé, the Crimson Tide's week-to-week consistency remains under scrutiny.
Alabama holds a 2-2 record against opponents in the CFP Top 25, compared to Tennessee's 1-2 mark against that group.
That metric helped propel the Crimson Tide to the top of the two-loss pack.
A convincing win over No. 6 Kentucky gave Alabama another marquee badge.
Yet Alabama's offense under coordinator Ryan Grubb has experienced wild swings throughout the autumn.
Quarterback Keelon Russell has generated genuine excitement with flashes of elite potential.
The Crimson Tide possesses enough offensive weapons to challenge any secondary in the country.
However, extended stretches of stagnancy have plagued the unit in key contests.
The running game has disappeared for full quarters at a time.
The offensive line has frequently struggled to open consistent lanes or sustain protection.
Drives have repeatedly stalled early, forcing the team to rely on erratic splash plays.
Against Tennessee in Week 7, those offensive flaws were exposed completely.
The Crimson Tide could not establish any offensive rhythm against Tennessee's front four.
THE ONGOING PLAYOFF DEBATE
The initial playoff rankings are only a starting point, but they set a crucial baseline for the final month.
By placing Alabama at No. 5, the committee positioned the Crimson Tide within touching distance of a top-four seed and a first-round bye.
Meanwhile, Tennessee must battle from the fringe of the field just to secure a postseason bid.
The decision has challenged traditional assumptions about how much head-to-head results matter to the selection panel.
For former players like McElroy, common sense on the field should carry significant weight.
As the regular season races toward its conclusion, the debate over that 16-point night in Knoxville will only intensify.
Should Tennessee automatically be ranked ahead of Alabama based on their head-to-head win in Knoxville?
Advertisement





